NewsBin 0 discussing
--:--:--
Daily Reset
NewsBin
--:--:--
Until Daily Reset
Mainstream Ars Technica 1 days ago

Environmentalists turn out in force to oppose Trump coal ash rollbacks

Environmentalists and public health advocates strongly opposed the Trump administration’s proposed rollbacks to coal ash regulations during a virtual public comment hearing. The administration seeks to repeal a 2024 EPA rule that mandated utilities to monitor coal ash sites at inactive coal plants and to loosen groundwater protection requirements near these sites. The new proposal would shift oversight to states, allowing some to bypass national standards, and exempt certain coal ash storage sites from regulation, potentially delaying or minimizing cleanup efforts. Coal ash, the mineral residue left after burning coal for electricity, contains toxic substances such as mercury, arsenic, and lead, which pose significant health risks including cancer. Despite over half of coal ash being repurposed annually in products like concrete and drywall, a 2022 study found that 90 percent of coal power plants in the U.S. contaminate groundwater through coal ash residues. Environmental groups argue that the rollbacks jeopardize drinking water safety and favor polluters, undermining decades of progress in managing coal combustion waste. Supporters of the rollbacks, including industry groups like the American Coal Ash Association and the American Cement Association, defend the changes as necessary to promote “beneficial use” of coal ash. They emphasize coal ash’s value as a domestic mineral resource that enhances the strength and durability of concrete and supports critical supply chains. The proposed revisions would redefine coal ash used in cement manufacturing as part of the production process rather than industrial waste, reflecting a shift aimed at accommodating industry needs amid declining coal ash supplies. The debate highlights the tension between environmental protection and industrial interests as the U.S. transitions away from coal energy. The outcome of these regulatory changes will have significant implications for public health, environmental safety, and the future management of coal combustion residuals nationwide.

Original story by Ars Technica View original source

0 comments
0 people discussing

Anonymous Discussion

Real voices. Real opinions. No censorship. Resets in 5 hours.

No account needed Anonymous • Resets in 5h

Loading comments...

About NewsBin

Freedom of speech first. Anonymous discussion on today's news. All content resets every 24 hours.

No accounts. No tracking. No censorship. Just honest conversation.