What weapon could the US have put into space?

This video can not be played Could there be an arms race in space? The BBC's defence correspondent explains what the US announcement means The announcement a space weapon in Earth's orbit has raised questions about what weaponry is actually in space, and what role it could play in efforts . Washington has given away little in its announcement. Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink said the "on orbit" weapon was necessary to safeguard US forces against hostile enemy action, but gave no details about the weapon's capabilities or when it was put into orbit. So what could this weapon be, and what is the wider picture like for military developments in space? Who else could have similar weaponry? Space has been a militarised domain since the start of the space age - in the late 1960s, the Soviet Union deployed weapons up there. The Istrebitel Sputnikov (IS; Satellite Destroyer) programme was made up of satellites that were designed to release projectiles that detonated, releasing shrapnel into the path of another (usually American) satellite. Nowadays, advanced militaries deploy satellites in space for a range of purposes, including reconnaissance, secure communications, detecting missile launches and providing precise location information for targeted strikes. As warfare becomes more technologically advanced, analysts expect the use of military hardware in space to increase. Some types of space weaponry could create a lot of debris and destruction Dr Bleddyn Bowen, an associate fellow in military sciences at the Royal United Services Institute and associate professor in astropolitics at Durham University, said he was only able to hazard a guess about the weapon announced . "I would expect there to be some kind of electronic warfare or radio-jamming platform, possibly, this would be a non-destructive kind of anti-satellite weapon," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Such weaponry already exists on Earth and can disrupt satellite communications, he said. "If you take out the radio links then your satellite is very useless." Bowen also would not rule out a riskier and more disruptive type of weaponry, which could create debris and destruction. "Less likely would be a kinetic kill vehicle of some sort, so a vehicle that would release a projectile that could ram into a satellite and destroy it," he said. A type of "close inspection and grappling satellite would be another possibility as well." As to whether rivals such as Russia and China have similar weaponry already in orbit, is difficult to tell. "If we're looking towards China and Russia, they have both displayed activity," Juliana Suess, a former research fellow at RUSI and researcher at the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (German Institute for International and Security Affairs), told the BBC. "For example, with Russia, we've seen some activity that hints at being a co-orbital weapons test.