Will caning bullies change their behaviour?

By 2027, all schools will implement standardized disciplinary measures for various misbehaviours, including detention and conduct grade adjustments. A particularly contentious aspect of the new guidelines is the allowance for bullies to receive up to three strokes of the cane. This policy has sparked debate among parents, educators, and lawmakers, despite caning being a longstanding disciplinary practice in schools. The renewed focus on caning comes amid a slight increase in reported bullying cases. Education correspondent and former teacher Elisha Tushara, along with Ang Boon Min, CEO of the Singapore Children’s Society, discussed the controversy surrounding the measure. Critics question whether caning will effectively change the behaviour of persistent bullies or if alternative approaches might be more appropriate. The debate also touches on the role of parents and whether their involvement in confronting bullies could exacerbate the problem. The discussion highlights broader concerns about the best methods to address bullying in schools, balancing discipline with the need for supportive interventions. While caning is seen by some as a deterrent, others argue that it may not address the underlying causes of bullying or promote long-term behavioural change. The introduction of a uniform disciplinary framework aims to create consistency across schools but also raises questions about its impact on student welfare and school culture. As schools prepare to adopt these measures, stakeholders continue to weigh the effectiveness and ethical considerations of corporal punishment in education. The evolving discourse reflects ongoing efforts to find a balanced approach that ensures student safety, encourages positive behaviour, and supports the holistic development of all students.