Window blocking ‘inappropriate’ but outside building authority’s remit, Tai Po probe told

An independent inquiry into the deadly fire at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po is examining the roles of various government departments in the tragedy that claimed 168 lives and displaced nearly 5,000 residents. The fire broke out on November 26 last year during renovation work at the eight-block housing estate. On the 20th day of hearings, witnesses from the Buildings Department and the Home Affairs Department testified, focusing on issues such as the use of combustible polyfoam boards blocking windows, non-fire-retardant scaffolding mesh, and workers’ smoking habits, all identified as contributing factors to the severity of the blaze. Among the witnesses was Eunice Chan Hau-man, the Tai Po district officer at the time, who faced criticism for her management style and conduct following the disaster. Chan was reassigned shortly after the fire amid public backlash over her attire at a firefighter’s funeral and complaints about her handling of community concerns. The inquiry also heard from the Director of Fire Services, Andy Yeung Yan-kin, who acknowledged that fire hazards related to construction materials and processes fall within his department’s regulatory scope, reversing earlier statements by subordinates. He emphasized the need for closer cooperation among departments rather than simply passing complaints between agencies. The inquiry revealed that prior to the fire, residents had repeatedly reported fire safety risks to various government bodies, including the Fire Services Department, the Buildings Department, and the Labour Department. However, these complaints were often redirected between departments, with each believing the issue was outside their jurisdiction. This fragmentation and lack of coordinated response contributed to the failure to address critical fire hazards, exacerbating the disaster’s impact. The hearings continue as the committee seeks to clarify accountability and recommend measures to prevent similar tragedies. The case highlights significant gaps in Hong Kong’s fire safety oversight, particularly during building renovations, and underscores the importance of interdepartmental collaboration in managing public safety risks.